Respecting cultural diversity is a key component of understanding multiculturalism, but what happens if two cultures or nations disagree? Can one nation or culture apply rules for all others to follow? What about the issues of human rights? Can the international community hold 'honor killings' as a human rights crime even though one nation or culture (Syria) doesn't? Should there be internationally accepted rules regarding human rights regardless of culture? What about the wearing of clothing (the veil in some Islamic nations) or the rights of women in different cultures? Does multiculturalism mean there should be many diverse perspectives or one commonly accepted one? What are your thoughts?Answer the questions above in your own words [80 points] in detail and then ask a question [10 points] and respond to another student's posts [10 points].
'Honor' killing spurs outcry in Syria
By Rasha Elass, Contributor to The Christian Science MonitorWed Feb 14, 3:00 AM ET
Sixteen-year-old Zahra Ezzo died at the hospital last month after a brutal attack. But it was her brother who confessed to killing her - and her family who appointed him to carry out the murder.
Some experts estimate that 200 to 300 honor killings like Zahra's occur every year in Syria. Most receive little or no attention. But Zahra's murder - in part because it happened in the capital and not a rural area - has compelled Syria's grand mufti, cleric Ahmad Hassoun, to publicly condemn the crime, calling for the first time for the immediate protection of girls at risk and for legal reform on the basis that such crimes are un-Islamic. President Bashar al-Assad has also promised to find a solution.
Among the public, too, debate is rising about the practice and the laws that protect men who carry out such killings.
A key question is whether the brother should go on trial for premeditated murder - the family had planned it for months - or as someone who had no choice because the clan's honor was at stake.
Syria's law is lenient on a man who kills or injures his female relative if he catches her in "illegitimate sexual acts with another," or in a "suspicious state with another." If Zahra's brother is tried under this law, he might get out of jail in three months.
"This is what we're trying to change," said Yumun Abu al-Hosn, a founding member of the Association for Women's Role Development, one of the few nongovernment organizations in Syria. The association runs the girls' shelter where Zahra took refuge in her final months.
"We may not be able to stop honor killings overnight, but at least if the crime is tried as premeditated murder, then Zahra and others like her will have some dignity in death."
Zahra's case is also compelling because of the events surrounding it.
According to Zahra before her death, say sources who spoke to her before she died, her father was having an extramarital affair. If the clan had discovered this, Zahra's father and his mistress might have both been killed. A friend of Zahra's father, a young man who took a liking to the then-15-year-old, threatened to tell all unless Zahra ran away with him.
She agreed. But when the clan discovered that Zahra had left, they decided to pursue both and kill them. But the police found them first. They put the man in jail, where he stands to serve a 15-year prison sentence for the kidnap and rape of a minor, and where he is safe from the clan's wrath. They put Zahra in the shelter.
But only for nine months. During that time, Zahra's family tried three times to regain custody of her, but the association refused, saying the family could not guarantee Zahra's safety.
The family then asked one of Zahra's cousins to marry her, which according to tradition would restore honor to the family. Fawaz hardly knew Zahra and was not in on the plot to kill her. He agreed to marry her first out of chivalry, then because he fell in love with her.
Her family and the family of her soon-to-be-husband all came to the shelter to formalize her marriage, and her father signed a sworn statement guaranteeing that neither he nor anyone in the family would harm Zahra.
So Zahra, whose name means flower, moved into her new husband's home, an apartment one floor below her new in-laws in Damascus.
But one month later, her brother came to visit. On the morning of his third day with them, when Zahra's husband went to work and Zahra slept in, Fayez stabbed his sister to death.
Violence against women is coming under growing scrutiny in the Arab world. Last year, the United Nations Development Fund for Women sponsored for the first time a study on it in Syria, concluding that 1 in 4 women suffers physical abuse, usually from a male relative.
But honor killings, which happen in many Arab and Muslim countries as well as in Israel and Western Europe, are a touchy subject. Local religious and political leaders are usually reluctant to become involved in a clan's family affair, and authorities in many countries rarely report a crime as an honor killing, making gathering statistics very difficult.
Activists say that lawyers in countries with leniency laws for such killings often advise a male client accused of murder to claim it was in the name of honor to avoid the death penalty.
"There are hidden motives behind these murders. It could be for inheritance or for financial reasons or because the victim wanted to choose her husband - or she's been raped or she's a victim of incest," said Rana Husseini, a Jordan-based activist who is writing a book on honor killing.
Reforms are often slow or unusually targeted. Morocco, for example, recently gave women the right to a light sentence if they killed in a fit of fury.
"They said this way we're making our laws 'equal.' But how many women kill men? No one needs a PhD to realize that the impact will be discriminatory," said Taina Bien-Aimé, executive director at Equality Now, a New York-based international human rights organization.
One nation or culture shouldn’t be able to tell another what to do but in the case of the violence the human rights comes in to play and I don’t think any one should die for a little reason some nations or cultures are really brutal towards women and people in general in some places if you steal they cut your hand off, that would lower crime but it still comes in with the issue of human rights. I think the international rules of human rights should come in to play in situations like these. I think multiculturalism should be many diverse perspectives but when your putting peoples lives up you have to do what you think is right.
If two cultures or nations disagree then they wont be able to understand one another and get along.I dont think that one nation or culture should apply rules for all other to follow because no matter what i dont think one nation or culture can make rules for people to follow because people live different then other people. Multiculturalism means that there should be many diverse perspectives not just one commonly accepted one. Yes there should be internationally accetped rules regarding human rights to culture.
Respecting cultural diversity is a key component of understanding multiculturalism, but what happens if two cultures or nations disagree? Can one nation or culture apply rules for all others to follow? What about the issues of human rights? Can the international community hold 'honor killings' as a human rights crime even though one nation or culture (Syria) doesn't? Should there be internationally accepted rules regarding human rights regardless of culture? What about the wearing of clothing (the veil in some Islamic nations) or the rights of women in different cultures? Does multiculturalism mean there should be many diverse perspectives or one commonly accepted one?
I think that it’s obvious that not all nations are going to agree on everything. But with that said I also think that people should have a mind-set on multiculturalism meaning that they don’t immediately put down another culture just because they think differently than we do. I do think, though, that there is a certain limit to freedom. I think that these crimes should not be permitted because anything having to do with taking someone’s life is not justifiable for anything. I understand that some cultures don’t believe in certain things but punishment shouldn’t be death for just everything. I could not believe when I read that thing on the Syrian girl who was purposely killed by her brother because of adultery. I understand that having that happen is very embarrassing for the family but it wasn’t necessary for her life to be taken away. If anything they should’ve just had her stay married to that guy and just let them be. They didn’t need to take it that extra mile. I don’t think that the way people dress should be decided by one person. The way people dress is a way of them expressing their personalities and who they are and that shouldn’t be taken away from individuals. The rules about taken a human life should be taken a lot more serious. When it comes to murder I think it would in some way be justifiable but something such as adultery I don’t think it’s necessary for someone’s life to be taken from them. People need to know that not everyone is perfect and sometimes mistakes are made but depending on the outcome should determine the consequences of that person’s life. Women, though, should be given their deserved freedom. We have come a long way to get to where we are now and I don’t think it’s fair that in some countries, still, people have the idea that women are under men and shouldn’t have the same rights as men. Different cultures demand different ways of living but when it comes to crime that’s something that everyone should have the same thought process of. But that’s just me!! Maybe I’m wrong but this is what I think of it!!
i don't think it's okay for people to tell other people how they should live and do things. yeah, the way some nations are ran aren't right, but thats they way they live and if they don't like it then it's their job to do somthing about it. like in the middle east. we took their ruler, we killed him, we're "trying" to help the people live better, but look how they act about it. They want to live like that so let them be. thats the way they wanna live, good for them and if they don't like it then let them come here to America, we're not stopping them. so yeah, the US should mind their own business.
One nation or culture shouldn’t be able to tell another what to do but in the case of the violence the human rights comes in to play and I don’t think any one should die for a little reason some nations or cultures are really brutal towards women and people in general in some places if you steal they cut your hand off, that would lower crime but it still comes in with the issue of human rights. I think the international rules of human rights should come in to play in situations like these. I think multiculturalism should be many diverse perspectives but when your putting peoples lives up you have to do what you think is right.
I agree with you!! It's all about what's right and what's justifiable!! It's true that people should be able to live out their cultures but violence is something that needs to be taken more seriously! Good job!!!!
I think that it is their country and culture but some things are in-humane that go against the natural way of things they shouldn’t do what they are doing but we are not their boss we still can’t tell them what to do. I think the world should except the same kinds of rule based on human rights.
Respecting cultural diversity is a key component of understanding multiculturalism, but what happens if two cultures or nations disagree? Can one nation or culture apply rules for all others to follow? What about the issues of human rights? Can the international community hold 'honor killings' as a human rights crime even though one nation or culture (Syria) doesn't? Should there be internationally accepted rules regarding human rights regardless of culture? What about the wearing of clothing (the veil in some Islamic nations) or the rights of women in different cultures? Does multiculturalism mean there should be many diverse perspectives or one commonly accepted one? What are your thoughts? Answer the questions above in your own words [80 points] in detail and then ask a question [10 points] and respond to another student's posts [10 points].
i think there should be human rights regaurdless of the culture.. if you put urself in the girls position . she made a little mistake in life. and has to be killed for it.the women rights are also rediculous, because a women can do the same thing as a man. and some men are smaller and have a smaller built body then women. some women and take care of themselves better then men can. clothing isnt that big of a deal with me because it doesnt really effect or hurt you in any way.
another thing i have to say is... you never hear of places like argentina, nepal, or angola getting into all these world wars. sure they might have their civil wars and what not, but thats them taking care of their own problems. they don't get into world wars because they don't give a damn what the rest of the world is doing. i think the US should worry about the US before they worry about the rest of the world.
If there are two cultures or nations that disagree then they wont be able to understand one another and get along. I dont think that one nation or culture should apply rules for others to follow because I think that it will be hard because people live in different ways then other people. Multiculturalism means that there should be many diverse nations not just one and have just that one make all the rules. Yes, there should be rules all over the world just pretaining to how we treat other people due to their races and color, those are the rules that should be followed all over the world, no matter where you are from.
Respecting cultural diversity is a key component of understanding multiculturalism, but what happens if two cultures or nations disagree? Can one nation or culture apply rules for all others to follow? What about the issues of human rights? Can the international community hold 'honor killings' as a human rights crime even though one nation or culture (Syria) doesn't? Should there be internationally accepted rules regarding human rights regardless of culture? What about the wearing of clothing (the veil in some Islamic nations) or the rights of women in different cultures? Does multiculturalism mean there should be many diverse perspectives or one commonly accepted one?
I think that if a law in a nation is completely unfair or one-sided that someone should be able to come in, like the United Nations, and try to persuade the country to fix the unfair law. I don't think that other nations should be able to come in and be like 'Hey, you're wrong, do this!' because it's not really their country to live in. If the law really is wrong, I think that one day someone will realize it in the country and get it changed. The issue of human rights is pretty big. For example, people should not be enslaved by other people but they still are. Women are equal to men, but women are still looked down upon in many different cultures as being inferior. I think that the international community should hold honor killings as a human rights crime because just because you do something to 'dishonor' your family or clan you should be forgiven for your mistake, not killed. I think that the wearing of certain clothing, like the veil, should only be voluntary. Some people don't actually mind wearing it, and wear it for religious reasons. I think that if you shouldn't be forced to wear something that you don't want to. I think that multiculturalism means there are lots of different perspectives, but some of them aren't as civilized as others. But then who is to say what is civilized and what isn't? I mean, what may be considered civilized in the United States may seem very uncivilized in a different country or culture.
1. Respecting cultural diversity is a key component of understanding multiculturalism and if two cultures or nations disagree, then there can be a huge problem. One problem could be the possibilty of going to war against the other nation. Another could be to lose an ally that they could have prevented had they not had a disagreement.
2.One nation or culture can and cannot apply rules for all others to follow because the United States applies rules for the citizens to abide by but on the other hand, everyone has a different culture and if you're not a part of the one inforcing the rules than you more than likely won't follow them.
3. Human rights are the basic rights and freedoms to which all humans are entitled, often held to include the right to life and liberty, freedom of thought and expression, and equality before the law.
4.The international community can hold "honor killings" as a human rights crimes even though one nation of culture (Syria) doesnt because we see this as wrong and frown upon it. Even if it is part of Syria's culture it's terrible to even think that someone in my family could kill me or anyone for that part.
5. There should be internationally accepted rules regarding human rights regardless of culture because hate crimes and honor killings can be performed in many different nations with little or no penalties. This is disgraceful and the world should write a document like the Constitution and the Bill of Rights that every country must abide by.
6. The wearing of clothing or the rights of women in different cultures goes by the religion. Everyone should respect what someone chooses to do as long as it doesn't break any laws or harm anyone.
7. Multiculturalism means there should be many diverse perspectives and not one commonly accepted perspective because multiculturalism is a term describing the coexistence of many cultures in a locality, without any one culture dominating the region.
One nation or culture shouldn’t be able to tell another what to do but in the case of the violence the human rights comes in to play and I don’t think any one should die for a little reason some nations or cultures are really brutal towards women and people in general in some places if you steal they cut your hand off, that would lower crime but it still comes in with the issue of human rights. I think the international rules of human rights should come in to play in situations like these. I think multiculturalism should be many diverse perspectives but when your putting peoples lives up you have to do what you think is right.
I agree with you, human rights should come into play in these types of situations.
It's hard to read about how other countries punish people and handle their problems. Even though it's hard to read about it, we can't fix other country's problems and we can't tell other country's how to handle their problems. It's weird to think about, but on 9/11, the people from Afganistan who crashed the planes into the World Trade Center were considered heroes in their country. Suicide bombers are known as heros. Because they died for their beliefs..etc. In America, we don't kill ourselves for our beliefs. It's sad to read this story and know that these types of things happen everyday.
a days wrote: clothing isnt that big of a deal with me because it doesnt really effect or hurt you in any way.
But if you don't want to wear it and can't take it off in public without being arrested or getting in trouble in some way, wouldn't you rather not have a law making you wear something?
lexie wetzel wrote: 5. There should be internationally accepted rules regarding human rights regardless of culture because hate crimes and honor killings can be performed in many different nations with little or no penalties. This is disgraceful and the world should write a document like the Constitution and the Bill of Rights that every country must abide by.
I agree with that. I think everyone should be under one law and it should protect everyone's rights as a human being. I think the trouble with that though would be having international police and courts to enforce the laws. Even then, who's to say the countrie's would follow the laws?
I FEEL AS THOUGHT THAT WAS VERY WRONG AND THEY SHOULD HAVE NEVER DONE THAT HE SHOULD HAVE NEVER KILLED HIS SISTER AND ITS WRONG. BUT WERE TOTALLY DIFFERENT AND WE CANT DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT BECAUSE ITS NOT OUR ISSUE
nathan wrote: If there are two cultures or nations that disagree then they wont be able to understand one another and get along. I dont think that one nation or culture should apply rules for others to follow because I think that it will be hard because people live in different ways then other people. Multiculturalism means that there should be many diverse nations not just one and have just that one make all the rules. Yes, there should be rules all over the world just pretaining to how we treat other people due to their races and color, those are the rules that should be followed all over the world, no matter where you are from.
i agree with you cause i think if two nations disagree'd they wouldnt be able to understand one another to.
kevin wrote: I think that it is their country and culture but some things are in-humane that go against the natural way of things they shouldn’t do what they are doing but we are not their boss we still can’t tell them what to do. I think the world should except the same kinds of rule based on human rights.
I AGREE ITS NOT OUR PROBLEM WE CANT WORRY AOUT THERE ISSUES WE HAVE ENOUGH
Nations are always going to disagree on issues, that is unavoidable. When it comes to human rights though, the right not to be harmed by anyone, it should be universal, no matter how different their cultures are. I don’t think only one nation should be able to apply rules for every other nation to follow. I think the United Nations should be the ones in charge of these issues, that way a majority of the countries in the world could come to an agreement on human rights. The international community should hold ‘honor killings’ as a human rights crime even if another nation does not. Whether one culture considers killing for ‘honor’ a crime or not, it still should not be ignored. Outside countries shouldn’t attempt to change another one’s culture, but if that culture involves violence, then that violence should be stopped. Human rights laws need to be universally accepted to end the needless killing of so many people daily. I don’t think anyone should be forced to wear anything that they don’t want to wear. Although clothes may not seem like a big deal to some, forcing someone to wear something is just another violation of their rights. I think that as for multiculturalism there should be many different perspectives because diversity is very important, but as far as human rights goes it should universally recognized that everyone deserves to be protected from harm.
i do think it is very wronge that he killed his sister but if that there belives who are we to come in now and change that after so many years maybe they should learn on there own because by us telling them they will never learn they will just think that were wronge any try to agree with us
In my oppionion i think that now its to late for the us government to apologize to the famillies because its been so many years , bit i d think that african americans should be reambered for what they went threw, even thought now its to late we can just never forget think that african americans have gained a new respect. I think the issue of slavery is thought the right way in school, although i think that watching movies on how saves were treated on life back them will give the students a new perspective i say think because in my histroy class with mr. everett after watching movies i learned alot. I think that slavery should not be toloerated everyone either african american or any other nation should all have the same right and not be judges different because of your color or your nationallity. I think everyone should get involved in groups. .
One culture or nation can not apply rules for because life would be boring. If this happened there would be no human rights. There should not be rules about clothing if you don't want to wear it reguardless what culture. The rights of women should be equal to men in every culture. Being in a world of multiculturalism world does mean that there should be many diverse perspectives.
Tiff wrote: i do think it is very wronge that he killed his sister but if that there belives who are we to come in now and change that after so many years maybe they should learn on there own because by us telling them they will never learn they will just think that were wronge any try to agree with us
I agree with the first part of what you said. Didnt understand the last couple of words.
i belive we cant do anything about it because they have to know whats wronge and whats right ? we cant tell them because they will think that we are just coming in and telling them what tp do, instead of looking at it as they did something horriably wronge.
I think that its not right what they do in other countries I wish they would all be equal from woman to men but we cant change what the other countries do and we cant change there religen and i dont think we should judge them eighter because they dont say anthing about are ways of living but i hope that they have more simpity to what there doing and who there doing it to specialy if its a woman.
Thats true its not are issue because thats just causing use to have war with more countries but how about if it was one of are people living there do you think we should get in it then?
A nation should, by force, be able to apply rules for a nation if that nation isn’t capable of properly protecting the human rights of their citizens. The international community should “honor killings” as a human rights crime regardless of Syria’s stand on the issue. These aren’t rage-induced murders; they’re well planned, thought out attacks that are responsible for the deaths of over five thousand women annually. The inalienable human rights every one is due should transcend everything, regardless of nation, religion, culture, or gender. Multiculturalism should mean the coexistence of many diverse perspectives running off on one another, but when the topic of human rights is concerned, there should be no intangibles or different evasive clauses involved. It should all be definite and clearly explicit.
This is a pretty touchy subject. I dont think that the U.S. has any right to take it upon themselves to decide which cultures are right and which culture's are wrong. Culture IS diversity and if we didnt have it, then we would all be doing the same thing. If another culture said that Americans were wrong by letting boys and girls go to school together, the U.S would get pissed off. So why is it okay for us to say anything to anyone else? its all a matter of opinion. Im not saying that i agree with the laws of Syria or anything. I mean, killing off your own family member and being completely okay with it really makes me upset. But i think that we definitely need to respect the differences in other countries and try not to make up rules for them as we go along.
Tiff wrote: i do think it is very wronge that he killed his sister but if that there belives who are we to come in now and change that after so many years maybe they should learn on there own because by us telling them they will never learn they will just think that were wronge any try to agree with us
right. why should the u.s. butt into other people's beliefs? If we got away with doing that, then there wouldn't be other countries in the world, there would just me a million different versions of America.
Kate Snell! wrote: This is a pretty touchy subject. I dont think that the U.S. has any right to take it upon themselves to decide which cultures are right and which culture's are wrong. Culture IS diversity and if we didnt have it, then we would all be doing the same thing. If another culture said that Americans were wrong by letting boys and girls go to school together, the U.S would get pissed off. So why is it okay for us to say anything to anyone else? its all a matter of opinion. Im not saying that i agree with the laws of Syria or anything. I mean, killing off your own family member and being completely okay with it really makes me upset. But i think that we definitely need to respect the differences in other countries and try not to make up rules for them as we go along.
I agree with you that the U.S. doesn't have the right to eliminate any other country's culture, but I think that when it comes to protecting human rights and ending killings such as the one in this story, it is acceptable for the U.S. and other countries to intervene. I don't think we can or should ignore the fact that human rights are being violated and do nothing stop it.
If two nations disagree, they should try to work something out, and not by war like we're doing right now. We should speak to each other in a mature correct manner. One nation or culture can't apply rules for all others to follow because everyone has their own perspective and opinions. Human rights everyone is entitled too. We all believe in certain things, and have rights, and laws we need to obey. The international community can't hold 'honor killings' as a human rights crime even though one nation or culture (Syria) doesn't. It happens, but it shouldn't. I think it's all CORRUPTED. There shouldn't be rules regarding internationally acceptance. I think anybody should be able to come and go wherever they want. As long as they respect and obey the laws, and different cultures because why would you want to go places if your not going to respect their cultural background in their own country. If they don't follow those rules they should be taken back to their country. About the wearing of clothing (the veil in some Islamic nations) or the rights of women in different cultures, is wrong. It should be optional whether or not they want to wear the clothing. Every woman should have the right to do what she wants. Basically like America. If they don't want to wear those clothes they shouldn't be forced to do so. Like I said, I think it's corrupted, and unfair. Multiculturalism means there should be many diverse perspectives, because everyone is entitled to believe in any cultures and beliefs, the right to speak their minds and opinions. I get so mad about this; because life is unfair the way people are being treated in different counties and the poverty that's taking in different places. It honestly makes me upset, and its not fair how people in different countries have to obey by the rules given to them (the ridiculous ones) like the dress code, and working day in day out to sacrifice for money that is not considered a lot. If people want to live like that then that’s fine. Believe what you believe in, but If not I think they should try to move to a better place, without the society they live in being against them because that’s not right.
what happens if two cultures or nations disagree? When most two countries disagree death is the only outcome.
Can one nation or culture apply rules for all others to follow? They could, but it wouldn't be right.
What about the issues of human rights? The only human rights arethe ones we gives ourselves. they can be taken away just as easily as they can be given out.
Can the international community hold 'honor killings' as a human rights crime even though one nation or culture (Syria) doesn't? Well if the country(Syria) respected the country in which they lived(any country that honor killings are crimes) then they would have to respect that aspect of their culture even though it is not their custom.
Should there be internationally accepted rules regarding human rights regardless of culture? No, although it may seem wrong in different parts of the world but that's their culture, and no matter how strange or dimented it may seem we need to respect it as a part of their culture.
What about the wearing of clothing (the veil in some Islamic nations) or the rights of women in different cultures? Again, they should be able to wear that if it's part of their culture. Not for photo IDs or anything but in normal day to day life, sure why not. People just can't be stupid about it. Use common sense when dealing with things of that nature.
Does multiculturalism mean there should be many diverse perspectives or one commonly accepted one? Multiculturalism is the understanding of many cultures and coping with them. It's not about accepting so-and-so's culture or making people accept yours. What it's all about is understanding and respecting one anothers' culture.
-When 2 nations disagree completely with each other war would be the main outcome -I belive they could but i really dont think the citizens would appreciate that very much. - I think humn rights are taken for granted sumtimes they can be stripped form us if we abuse them. - No because they have to respect that countries culture. - No because every culture hadthere own thing going on a no 1 has the right to just take that from them - I dont see any problem in women wearing a garment that represents there beliefs. If peolpe have a problem with it then that too badd. -Multiculturilism is when there are many cultures living with eachother and not having conflicts basically toleratinf each culture without problems.
I think when two cultures or nations disagree, they need to learn to respect eachothers culture. Respecting anothers culture means let them believe what they want, theres no such thing as a wrong culture. I do not agree with one nation setting the rules for all others to follow because there going to base the rules on their beliefs and no one elses and that not fair to others. I know I would hate being forced to follow someone elses culture when I have my own. Human rights is universal rights of human beings regardless of jurisdiction or other factors, such as ethnicity, nationality, religion, or gender. I think that its wrong period.. but no I don’t think the international community should hold “honor killings”as a human rights crime even though one nation or culture doesn’t because like I said before different cultures have there own rules and regulations and their own way of handling things but its taking another life. When it comes to another person who have NOO right to harm then in such away as honor killing regardless if they might of supposedly dishonored the family. Life is one of the most precious treasures we can have. I agree with people making up there own laws to a certain extent. When it comes to taking ones life, there should be internationally accepted rules regarding human rights regardless of culture. I think women should have the same rights as men. Why must we wear veils? If a woman gets raped she gets killed and the man who did the raping or even commited the murder either get away with it or get months in jail.?.!!! now I have a big issue with that. Were all human beings so we should be treated equally regardless the gender. Don’t discriminate. Respecting others and their gender, ethnicity, religion and nationality is muliculturalism.
i think we do need to respect other cultures but...when there killing teens because of situations that might not even be their fault is a serious tragedy that needs to be stopped and the really sad part is that its by your own family members....and if that means the U.S needs to step in the so be it.
No, one nation or culture cannot apply rules for all other to follow not even if two countries disagree with one another.As for honor killings that should be forbidden in any culture or nation.However, if thats what your culture believes in then go ahead but in the case of someone else, like someone in Syria who doesnt believe in that should not have to go by that rule.Yes, there should be international rules that are accepted regarding human rights no matter the culture or nation.Not everyone believes in the same things and that should be respected everywhere.In my personal opinion I dont think it is right for women to have to wear those viels when the men dont have to.However, I know that some women want to wear them because it represents there religion, but I do feel you should have the right to choose.Multiculturalism to me means that there should be many diverse perspectives.Everyone should be able to have their own perspective on things and I believe thats what makes the world go round.
What happens if two cultures or nations disagree? When two cultures or nations disagree they usually end up going to war. Can one nation or culture apply rules for all others to follow? Yes definitely, its done all the time. What about the issues of human rights? People can so easily take away your human rights. Can the international community hold honor killings as a human rights crime even though one nation or culture doesnt? Yes because I dont believe that its right to kill someone just because of culture. Should there be internationally accepted rules regarding human rights regardless of culture? Yes because whats right is right and whats wrong is wrong screw the culture. What about the wearing of clothing or the rights of women in different cultures? Yeah that whole veil and turban thing its stupid but w/e. I believe that every woman should have the same rights as males, everywhere but thats just my opinion. Does multiculturalism mean there should be many diverse perspectives of one commonly accepted one? I mean it would be great just to have one commonly accepted one but then that would be boring in the sense of music, dance, food, the language.
shallyn carreiro wrote:i think we do need to respect other cultures but...when there killing teens because of situations that might not even be their fault is a serious tragedy that needs to be stopped and the really sad part is that its by your own family members....and if that means the U.S needs to step in the so be it.
If two cultures or nations disagree, cultural strife would begin. Fighting would be common to see and everyone there would be in danger. Deaths and damage to surroundings would also most likely occur. I think that no nation or culture has the right to apply any rules for another country or culture. Each nation and culture should be able to practice and follow their traditions as long as it is within the limits of that particular nation's laws. It would be a good thing if there were internationally accepted laws regarding human rights but I also value everyone's cultural traditions and beliefs. The wearing of certain types of clothing is different depending on the type of society in that certain region. If it is part of their religion then it should be upheld as long as that person wishes to follow it. Women in certain cultures have very little rights. If it is in their beliefs, then it should be followed. Like I stated before, if they wish to follow those particular beliefs, then they should be able to follow it until they wish to do so no more. To me, multiculturalism means that there are many diverse perspectives and not just one commonly accepted one. Each culture has its' own set of beliefs and traditions, trying to change any of it would be tampering with years and years of history. Although in the case of "Honor Killings", they should no be permitted since the cleric had said that it was "non-Islamic". Such killings should be dealt with in a serious matter as it concerns the safety of the people in that culture. I think that with the way many other countries are run today, different cultures as well as religious differences would most definitely limit rules concerning human rights greatly. In my opinion, having universal rules regarding human rights wouldn't be possible without violating at least one group's beliefs and traditions.